
- Students must apply to take the Comprehensive Exam through the Brooklyn College Portal. Click eServices and Student Transactions.
- Students
in the MA English Teacher program
are required to pass a comprehensive examination. This three hour test
is given twice a year, in the fall and spring semesters.
Students entering the MA English program in Fall 2010 or thereafter are no longer required to pass a comprehensive examination.
- The exam is usually taken at the end of the final semester of coursework or in the semester following. To be eligible for the exam,
MA English Teacher students must have completed, or be in the process of completing, 5 English courses. They must also have a
cumulative GPA of 3.0 or higher and have resolved all incompletes in their courses.
- All
students are encouraged to purchase the current
edition of M.H. Abrams' A Glossary of Literary Terms and to use
it in all their literature courses. The identification questions in
Part I of the examination will be selected from this book.
- The
exam tests students' knowledge in the following areas:
knowledge of literary terms and historical concepts; understanding of
major modern literary critical issues; ability to write a coherent essay
in clear and lively style, free of grammatical errors.
Allegory
Alliteration
Augustan age
Blank verse
Canon of literature
Comedy
Courtly love
Chivalric romance
Cultural studies
Deconstruction
Dialogic criticism
Dramatic irony
Dream vision
Elegy
Enlightenment
Epic simile
Feminist Criticism
Formalism
Frame story
Free verse
Gothic novel
Great chain of being
Harlem Renaissance
Humanism
Irony
Marxism
Metaphor
Metaphysical poets
Meter
Modernism
Naturalism
Neoclassic
New Criticism
New Historicism
Old English period
Postcolonial studies
Postmodernism
Poststructuralism
Problem play
Prosody
Psychoanalytic criticism
Psychological criticism
Reader-response criticism
Realism
Reception theory
Renaissance
Restoration
Romantic
Satire
Semiotics
Seven deadly sins
Sonnet
Stream of consciousness
Structuralist criticism
Textual criticism
Tragedy
Transcendentalism in America
Read through
the entire examination before beginning to write, and allocate your
time carefully.
I. PART ONE tests
your knowledge of literary terms, critical and theoretical approaches,
and historical concepts. Choose five of the following fifteen
terms, and write a single, well-developed paragraph on each one.
NOTE: The list
of terms will be chosen from the current edition of A Glossary
of Literary Terms by M. H. Abrams (Harcourt, Brace College Publishers).
| Allegory |
Poststructuralism |
Cultural
Studies |
| Prosody |
Transcendentalism |
Restoration |
| Sonnet |
Tragedy |
Feminist
Criticism |
| Neoclassic |
Modernism |
Psychoanalytic
Criticism |
| Irony |
New
Historicism |
Romantic |
PART TWO asks
you to write two well-developed essays, based on several different
courses you have taken. Answer two of the following questions.
Reflect as much as possible what you have learned about various periods,
topics, terms, and critical methods. Within your answer, DO NOT write
two separate mini-essays on two separate periods or works. Each of
your answers should be a unified essay drawing examples from more
than one historical period.
A. Robert Southey
once wrote to Charlotte Brontë, ″Literature is not the
business of a woman's life, and it cannot be.″ His condescending
point of view toward women raises broader questions about the role
of women in the production and consumption of literature. Discuss
two or three principal ways in which women writers and or readers
have affected our responses to literature. Make specific reference
to at least two works drawn from different periods, literary or critical,
in developing your response.
B. The critic
Mikhail Bakhtin posits that the novel comprises ″a plurality
of independent unmerged voices,″ in other words different kinds
of language, juxtaposed to emphasize that they are in a condition
of conflict. Bakhtin's example is the novels of Dostoevsky, but the
concept is far broader (Sidney's sonnets, The Canterbury Tales,
plays of Shakespeare, Dickens's novels, Ulysses). Discuss the
plurality of voices in two works (not necessarily novels) drawn from
different periods.
C. An assumption
may be made that the narrator of a work of fiction differs from the
actual living author who wrote the work. The narrator may be an ″implied
author,″ interested in and knowledgeable about the characters
and events he or she reports on but not directly involved with them;
or, at the other extreme, the narrator may be a character in the story
with a definite purpose in telling the story as he or she wants to
tell it. The narrator may, in short, express a wide range of relationships
to the narrative.
Discuss the effect
of narrative point of view on overall style, characterization, and
theme, using as examples two works of fiction drawn from different
periods that differ from one another in their narrative point of view,
indicating the kind(s) of narrator(s) used in each work.
D. Ralph Ellison
says in Shadow and Act that the mainstream of American culture
is not the problem; it is that somebody has mystified the mainstream
by obscuring the role of African-Americans. Any viable theory of a
period of literary history obligates us to find which expressions,
poems, plays, or fictions have been obscured and now must be uncovered.
Where in literary history do you see literatures, populations, or
modes of expression that have been marginalized? Explain.
E. You have encountered several modern critical approaches during your study for the Master of Arts degree (such as feminist, psychological, Marxist, and historical). We are interested in knowing how you move from an understanding of the theory to its practical application in the classroom. Discuss how you could integrate one or two modern critical approaches into the teaching of two texts drawn from two different historical periods.
- Does the writer
understand the critical issues raised by the question?
- Is the writer
familiar with other theoretical or critical texts than the one cited
in the question?
- Has the writer
demonstrated breadth of knowledge of texts without becoming superficial?
- Has the writer
selected examples from more than one historical time period?
- Is the essay
coherent and organized?
- Does the writer
indicate the ability to pay close attention to details when analyzing
texts?
- Have all parts
of the question been considered?
- Are there
a minimum of grammar and style problems?
- Take time
to read the question carefully and understand what is being
asked.
- Take time
to plan your response, including the formulation of a proposition
and at least a rough outline of the essay's principal parts
and the chief examples you will use.
- Answer
all parts of the question.
- It is
not necessary to repeat the question, but be sure to address
the issues raised and to place them in a theoretical context.
- Tie your
examples to critical issues.
- Demonstrate
understanding of key critical terms used in the question.
- One way
to demonstrate breadth of knowledge of texts is to construct
a paragraph that presents a series of examples.
- Be sure
to discuss at least two texts (from two different historical
periods) in some detail.
- Avoid
vague language and broad, unsupported generalizations.
- Avoid
retelling stories, plots, or narratives.
- And don't
forget to
purchase the current edition of M.H. Abrams' A Glossary of
Literary Terms. As stated above, the identification questions
in Part I of the examination will be selected from this book.
|