|
Institute for Studies In American Music |
|
|
|
|
|
Inside This Issue: Music of Williamsburg by Carol J. Oja Scorsese's Narratives of Blues Discovery: Review by Ray
Allen Eric Porter's What is This Thing Called Jazz?:
Review by Roger Sessions and Arthur Berger: Review by Anton Vishio Sondheim's Bounce:
Review by Gayle Sherwood and Jeffrey Magee |
Thinking Jazz
Eric Porter’s What is
This Thing Called Jazz?: African American Musicians as Artists,
Critics, and Activists ( Recognizing certain black
jazz musicians as a class of Gramscian
intellectuals who may lack By examining figures as
diverse as Duke Ellington, Abbey Lincoln, Mary Lou Williams, and Anthony
Braxton, Porter reveals that the commentary of black musicians constitutes an
intellectually vibrant, conflicting and varied, deeply probing body of
thought. Among the ideas discussed in this book are the propriety of the term
jazz; the degree to which jazz is a symbol of black achievement versus the
degree to which it is properly understood as a part of universal human
culture; the aesthetic, political, and economic tensions between jazz and
European art music; and the tensions between jazz and popular music. Along with other recent
works such as Sherrie Tucker’s Swing Shift, Scott DeVeaux’s
Birth of Bebop, and Ronald Radano’s New
Musical Figurations, Porter’s effort offers sustained analyses of how
specific musical movements and figures are situated with respect to larger
historical and cultural concerns. Consequently, the relationship of jazz to
issues of gender roles and sexuality, black nationalism, cultural
exploitation, and spirituality are explored in depth. Porter is not
tendentious and avoids taking sides, always careful to give each position its
best light. Rather than posit a coherent narrative about the ultimate
meanings of jazz he argues that jazz music and practice have remained a
paradox for over a century, given the contradictions inherent in a putative
American expression thoroughly ensconced in capitalism that managed to provided an important voice of cultural dissent. Porter documents how jazz musicians have
functioned in this paradoxical space with a full and complicated
understanding of all the ironies and tensions inherent in jazz practice. Such
an argument goes against the prevalent mythologies that portray jazz
musicians as naive artists at best and idiot savants at worst. The crucial point for Porter
is that some musicians have moved through this paradox
self-consciously—that is, they have not only participated in jazz
activities, but they have thought about their positions and have theorized
their meanings and possibilities. So, for instance, “[African American
jazz musicians] have not merely produced music that speaks of the forces of
capitalist production; they have articulated what it means to contend with
these forces while trying to create an artistic expression” (p. 335). Porter covers ample terrain
moving diachronically throughout the twentieth century. The chapter “A Marvel of Paradox”
discusses jazz in association with African American modernity. Assuming that African American modernity
intersects with white The chapter “Dizzy
Atmosphere” addresses the challenge of bebop by engaging the canonical
writings of DeVeaux, von Eschen,
Baraka, Lott, as well as the voices of Mary Lou
Williams, Billy Taylor, Herbie Nichols, Gil Fuller,
Richard Boyer, et al. The place of bop within the fractious jazz community
was contested through political activism, religious statement, theoretical
musings, and genre bending. Porter demonstrates how the consciousness of the
jazz community was forever changed by this musical movement, and how the
music’s political and aesthetic reverberations went far beyond the
market boundaries of bebop. Subsequent chapters examine
other seminal moments in jazz history, covering a carefully selected set of
themes from the beginning of the twentieth century to its close. While there is no chapter on gender per se,
Porter engages gendered and sexualized aspects of jazz music. By exploring
Charles Mingus’s explicitly rendered sexual
politics in his autobiography Beneath the Underdog, and Abbey Lincoln’s
critiques of black masculinism in her 1966 Negro
Digest essay, “Who Will Revere the Black Woman?,” Porter
complicates the traditional set of polemics surrounding gender and sexuality
in jazz. A similar dialectical structure can be construed in the
juxtaposition of two chapters on “creative music” that probe the
iconoclastic upstarts of the 1960s and 1970s such as Ornette
Coleman, Cecil Taylor, and Andrew Cyrille, with the final chapter, “The Majesty of
the Blues,” which examines Marsalis’s neo-conservative movement. Eric Porter succeeds
magnificently in his corrective to one of the gaping holes in African
American intellectual history and in jazz studies. His volume will make it
impossible for musicologists and historians to ignore the voices of jazz
musicians when seeking to understand the place of jazz in twentieth-century
American culture. —Salim
Washington |
|
|
|