Institute for Studies In American Music
Conservatory of Music, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York
NEWSLETTER


Volume XXXIV

 


No. 2    Spring 2005

Inside This Issue:

Inside         This Issue

 

Jungle Jive: Race, Jazz, and Cartoons by Daniel Goldmark

 

Taking Henry Flynt Seriously by Benjamin Piekut

 

Hearing Hip-Hop’s Jamaican Accent by Wayne Marshall

 

Capturing Sound and Making Beats: Review by Joseph Auner

 

Ives's 129 Songs: Review by Gayle Sherwood Magee

American Popular Music: Review by Daniel Sonenberg

 

 

American Popular Music:

Review by Daniel Sonenberg

 

 

 

The Supremes

 

 

“The history of American popular music,” write Larry Starr and Christopher Waterman, “is best thought of, not as a single story told in a single voice, but as a variegated and continually shifting landscape, characterized by the complex interaction of various styles, performers, audiences, and institutions.” In charting this diverse terrain for their book American Popular Music: From Minstrelsy to MTV (Oxford University Press, 2003; $69.95), Starr and Waterman rely on a similarly eclectic range of expertise. Starr, a professor of music history at the University of Washington, has published books on Charles Ives and Aaron Copland, and it is worth noting that the title to his book on Ives, A Union of Diversities, could have served equally well as a subtitle to the current volume. Waterman, a professional jazz bassist, anthropologist, and ethnomusicologist, is Professor of World Arts and Cultures at UCLA, and has written Jùjú: A Social History and Ethnography of an African Popular Music (1990). Bringing their various strengths to the task, Starr and Waterman achieve a remarkably well-balanced and thorough survey.

As the authors point out on the first page of their preface, the interdisciplinary nature of American Popular Music, which combines “the study of cultural and social history on the one hand, and the analytical study of musical style on the other” (p. vii), distinguishes it in its field. Starr and Waterman's seamless union of two potentially conflicting orientations, the historical and analytical, should be as instructive to denizens of popular music studies journals, conferences, and listservs as it is enlightening to the book’s non-specialist target audience. The attempt to achieve such a balance has exercised scholars of popular music for the past quarter century, during which time pop has emerged from its once ghettoized position in the ranks of musicological subject matter to become a hot topic. It is this rise from oblivion that has engendered the kind of college-level popular music survey for which American Popular Music would be an excellent textbook.

If the “diversities” of American popular music—ranging from nineteenth-century minstrelsy through twentieth-century Tin Pan Alley song, swing, blues, country, doo-wop, rock ’n’ roll, heavy metal, punk, new wave, rap, reggae, and techno—are self-apparent, ways in which these disparate strands might be understood to constitute a “union” may be less so. To that end, Starr and Waterman identify several “themes and streams” in their opening chapter, narrative threads and sources of influence that span the chronological divide from Steven Foster to Ani DiFranco, offering some sense of diachronic continuity to an otherwise dizzying array  of styles and milieus. These themes include “Listening,” “Music and Identity,” “Music and Technology,” “The Music Business,” and “Centers and Peripheries,” and these are by no means mutually exclusive. Thus can the “long, complicated history of white fascination with black music” (p. 453) including the music of  minstrelsy, Paul Whiteman, Bill Haley, the Beatles, and the Beastie Boys be understood in the thematic contexts of Music and Identity, Centers and Peripheries, and the Music Business. While these monikers are only explicitly rearticulated in the book’s conclusion, their presence as an organizing principle is felt throughout and infuses the narrative with nuance.

Starr and Waterman resist essentialist arguments and tired standard tropes. About the common distinction between black and white music, they observe: "The very fact that Americans speak of black and white music as though these were self-evident, well-defined entities stems from a particular history of racial segregation—and from the so-called Jim Crow laws designed during the early twentieth century to prevent racial commingling in the American South"  (p. 453).

This tendency to deal unblinkingly with sensitive issues extends to their treatment of gender and sexuality, politics, race, and ethnicity in relation to such contrasting artistic personae as those of Merle Haggard, Ice Cube and k.d. lang.

Listening is the central unifying theme of American Popular Music, which comes packaged with two CDs of musical examples, representing only a fraction of the many songs and recordings invoked over the course of the book. It is in considering specific songs and styles that Starr and Waterman’s interdisciplinary approach shines the brightest, as neither technical detail, nor social significance, nor the ever-elusive “meaning,” in all its myriad guises, are treated as secondary. Listening examples are treated in a number of ways, from brief mentions that last a sentence or two, to multiple-page “Listening and Analysis” sections, complete with listening charts. Like the rest of the book, these detailed accounts are written in a lively, engaging manner, and routinely present fresh insights on familiar material. After describing the unconventional formal structure of The Supremes’ “You Can’t Hurry Love,” the authors deftly observe that:

All this play with form would be just so much intellectual busywork if it didn’t reflect on the meaning of the song. “You Can’t Hurry Love” is a song about the importance of waiting. Formally, the song keeps us guessing—waiting for clarification for the functional relationships among the different sections. (p. 243)

The analyses do without musical notation, and technical terms that appear in boldface are defined in a glossary.

One of the few shortcomings about American Popular Music concerns the accompanying audio examples. The CDs are at times painfully incomplete, due of course to licensing restrictions and cost as the authors acknowledge in the preface, and even for some of the larger analyses the reader will have to find recordings elsewhere. In the age of iTunes, however, this absence is a diminishing inconvenience. A future edition would benefit from a discography and a list of listening examples in addition to the list of CD tracks, which is provided.

These points aside, American Popular Music: From Minstrelsy to MTV is a tremendous accomplishment. A vast array of styles and contexts are skillfully brought together in a coherent and thoroughly readable narrative, and the authors’ delight in their subject matter is palpable on every page. For the student, teacher, or general reader interested in pop, this book unquestionably becomes the definitive survey text.

Daniel Sonenberg

University of Southern Maine

 

 

 

 

 


ISAM home   Who we are      Contact us       ISAM Conferences and Lectures
 
Monographs   ISAM Web Documents     Newsletters    Links
 
 

Copyright © 2005 Institute for Studies in American Music, Conservatory of Music, Brooklyn College. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed by J. Graeme Fullerton & maintained by Carl Clements, Managing Editor